The Internet is at a crossroads. Today, it is generally open, interoperable and unified. Any Internet user can exchange email with more than two billion other global Internet users; entrepreneurs can launch services such as eBay and Amazon and quickly turn them into multibillion-dollar businesses; and people from all across the world can connect with others, share ideas, and improve democratic governance through social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter.
Over the past decade, however, an increasing number of journalists and academics have noted – often in alarmist terms – the ways in which government censorship programs, powerful commercial interests, concerns over cybersecurity, and other dynamic changes in the Internet ecosystem are pulling the global network apart into various distinct, idiosyncratic “internets,” threatening the global communication, economic prosperity and innovation the Internet has fostered over the past two decades.1
Yet despite the proliferation of articles and commentaries on this “balkanization” of the Internet, there has been little consensus about which parts of the Internet are fragmenting, what changes in the Internet ecosystem are causing the fragmentation to occur, and to what degree these processes should be a concern. This article, drawn from a larger working paper exploring Internet balkanization, will highlight one of the lesser-explored threats to a unified global Internet: the potential collapse of the Internet standards process. (purchase article…)
Image Credit: Harland Quarrington/MOD, OGL v1.0OGL v1.0, via Wikimedia Commons
This is an archived article. While every effort is made to conserve hyperlinks and information, GJIA’s archived content sources online content between 2011 – 2019 which may no longer be accessible or correct.
Jonah Force Hill is a technology and international strategy consultant and recent graduate of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, where he was a Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Fellow.
